PMK founder Dr Ramdoss has by his vociferus speech in the general council meet in Chennai on June 20, 2008, has closed the chances for any reconciliation with DPA alliance led by DMK in Tamilnadu.
Though Chief Minister Karunanidhi was willing to reconsider his party's decision to sever the ties with PMK if Kaduvetti Guru and Ramdoss expressed regret for the speech of Guru to kill the Union Minister Raja and Andimadam MLA Sivasankar, Ramdoss was in no mood to accept the offer.
His main contention was that the issue was settled 3 months before. But neither he nor any of his party colleagues have denied about Mr Guru's speech. So, it is true that the gentleman Guru had threatened to kill Raja and Sivasankar. Though it happened 6 months earlier, TN police has not arrested Guru for the simple reason that he is notorius in that area and he is close to Ramdoss.
Even Ramdoss has accepted in a statement issued last week that the issue was settled in March itself. What does it mean? If a person from alliance party issues death warning to anybody he can be pardoned if both leaders accept. Is this the rule of law? Will the police allow any individual to go scot free if he threatens anybody?
How dare Ramdoss justifies Guru speech who had threatened to kill Union Minister and sitting MLA. What do politicians think? Do they feel people are idiots?
What the government is doing? What is the role of Police? Don't they have responsibility to ensure equal justice to all?
The irony is the department comes under CM's portfolio. How can he say that govt would take action if any IAS official gives complaint?
Is it not the responsiblity of the govt to nab such persons to ensure public peace. CM has the required primafacie evidence in the form of C.D. And Ramdoss himself has accepted through his speech that Guru had spoken it.
Then what prevents Police to take action?
No comments:
Post a Comment